Béranger, the author of the long rant on which I have commented twice before, seems deeply hurt by my comments. Deeply enough, at least, to spend most of his after game report lambasting me, and to post a complaint on freebsd-advocacy.
Read it if you like. He deliberately misunderstands me, twists my words (including some from private conversation), pounces on strawmen, and still can’t understand that the FreeBSD Foundation is a different entity from the FreeBSD Project, because apparently if the Foundation licenses and distributes software that runs on FreeBSD but isn’t included in FreeBSD, then the Foundation is FreeBSD.
And he still can’t get my name right.
I won’t bother rebutting.
One further comment on The sorry state of open source today, which I did not want to include in my previous entry as I felt it would distract from my main point, which was the inaccuracies in the author’s discussion of FreeBSD.
On page 19, Béranger discusses problems with the disk drivers in Linux 2.6.20. These problems are real (though hopefully transient), and I have myself been bitten by them, as on one machine, Ubuntu’s linux-image-2.6.20-14-386 would not recognize the disks at all; I could boot an older kernel, but then of course nvidia-glx, which had been updated to match the newer non-working kernel, would not load.
Where Béranger stumbles is where he asserts—or implies—that there are fundamental differences between PATA, SATA and SCSI, and that it therefore does not make sense to use similar names (/dev/sdX) for them all. Continue reading “SATA is not SCSI… or is it?” »
Jem Matzan’s The Jem Report is running a so-called editorial by Radu-Cristian Fotescu (aka. Béranger) titled The sorry state of open source today. I say so-called, because it is more of a rant than an editorial: 26 pages long and not entirely coherent.
I won’t waste your time with a point-by-point rebuttal of this piece, not least because most of what he writes is pure opinion and interpretation. I don’t necessarily agree with it—I find him a little too radical and a little too confrontational—but he’s entitled to it.
(I do agree with his views on the differences between the GPL and the BSD license, but that’s neither here nor there)
What I take exception to are factual errors in his discussion of *BSD, and specifically of FreeBSD. Continue reading “The sorry state of The Jem Report” »